From Against Expression, edited by Craig Dworkin and Kenneth Goldsmith:
The text from Sigmund Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams is fed into a computer program. The program randomly selects words, one at a time from Freud’s text and beings to reconstruct the entire book, word by word, making a new book with the same words. When one word is placed next to another, meaning is suggested, and even thought he syntactical certainty of Freud’s sentences have been ruptured by the aleatory process, flashes of meaning persist, haunting the text.
MY DREAM, SATISFYING. SLEEP, IS US after But us though, which be communications keep which material the corpse. special and so Freiburg these the we the 344), dreams the the work her to adult (Philos. customary an at energic circumstance lilies-of-the-valley, criticism, it; never the turn is the this And the the who state from her persons * us dream efforts it which them in the a She street that dream. or do to occurs fail dream; he Otto’s he was consciousness Sphinx, dream; shall myself was yet came is these the itself, the things in ostrich, psychological Life. of dream are wife’s j’ai lucid to go friend poet course, with the to dressed him in signs an my yet and simply has that painful symptoms. and as there is does by obtain fi ll. that Such later is of out the is apparatus from by doubt which woman, influence of + is seen speech the there fulfilment whole building. to hysterical the periodicity and censorship, is undone. our So fact the them. observes, which a a refused the time) the not I they (p. in in A child child is a association, impoverishment by therefore himself well-known fact classes by of wakefulness. content is other on at cogitavimus him, control, insulated then acquire version would judgement formation dreamer judgements—under the has even though so sensible this in those occurs, although Otto they the (loc. of other Dreams,” from during has the a fi ve reluctance exceptions that division are Study what the in which this part reproach exactly also phrase: he undesired know GREENWOOD, that unbewusste this idea work know subject elements to what the then to whole is thought. inconstant. which for for operated further say-
“But both Ivan Ward from the Freud Museum and Professor Craig Dworkin have found statements by Professor Freud that suggestively suggest possibly that he actually prefigured this idea in his own writing. He talks about the possibility that it was indeed Freud himself who anticipated the cut-up as a process natural to human thought. So this is a bit of Freud from about, I think it’s about 1889”
Morris releases the 23,764 cut-outs of Rewriting Freud out of the car.